Independent product testing

We buy real products, use them for weeks, and only then write the review.

Every score published here comes from an extended period of ordinary use in a real home or a real office, never from a press briefing, a specification sheet or a fifteen minute demonstration.

Minimum six week test windowDrawbacks published in every reviewScores never sold or negotiated

Latest hands-on reviews

The line under each product is the short verdict. The full article carries the criterion by criterion breakdown, the list of what did not work, and the conditions the product was tested in.

How we test

The same four rules apply to every product, whatever it costs and whoever makes it.

We get hold of a real product

Units are bought at retail wherever possible. When a brand supplies one, that fact is stated inside the review and it buys no advantage in the scoring.

We live with it for weeks, not minutes

Nothing is assessed on first impressions. Each product spends at least six weeks in normal daily use, because most real faults only surface after the novelty wears off.

Each criterion is scored on its own

Comfort, durability, value and the rest are rated separately and locked in before an overall figure is worked out, so one excellent area cannot quietly disguise a poor one.

The drawbacks always get published

Every article contains a section on what did not work. No review goes live without one, and nothing is taken out after publication because a brand asked.

Highest scoring products right now

Ordered by overall score from the current round of testing. This table is rebuilt every time a new review is finished, so a product can move down as well as up.

#ProductBrandScore
1Sony WH-1000XM5Sony9.2 / 10
2Logitech MX Master 3SLogitech9.0 / 10
3Dyson V15 DetectDyson8.9 / 10
4Instant Pot Duo 7-in-1Instant Brands8.6 / 10
5Hydro Flask 32 oz Wide MouthHydro Flask8.4 / 10
6Uniqlo Ultra Light Down JacketUniqlo8.1 / 10

Brands we have reviewed

Each of these companies has been through an identical process and an identical scoring sheet. None of them paid to appear here.

  • Sony
  • Logitech
  • Dyson
  • Instant Brands
  • Hydro Flask
  • Uniqlo

Why a brand can trust this site

If you are weighing up whether to put a product in front of us, this is exactly what you are agreeing to and exactly what you get back.

Our editorial standards

Scores are decided by the person who did the testing and by nobody else. Coverage cannot be bought, a position in the ranking table cannot be bought, and where a page carries an affiliate link it has no bearing on the score, the wording or the order products appear in. Any commercial relationship that exists is disclosed on the article itself.

We will publish the drawbacks

Every review names the things that disappointed us, and we will not remove them later. We understand that is a risk for you. It is also the only reason readers act on what they read here, which means an honest strong result on this site is worth considerably more than a guaranteed one somewhere else.

How to submit a product for review

  1. Email us the product, the market it sells in, and the specific claims you would like put under pressure.
  2. We confirm whether it suits our readers and give you a realistic window, because the queue is finite.
  3. Send a standard retail unit, not a hand picked one.
  4. We test it for a minimum of six weeks and publish whatever we find.
  5. You receive the link when everyone else does. There is no preview and no approval step.

What you receive in return

A detailed, specific and genuinely independent assessment that carries weight precisely because it was not arranged in advance. The article stays online permanently and keeps working long after a campaign has finished. If we state something that is factually wrong, show us the evidence and we will correct it quickly and visibly.

Submit a product for reviewPartnership and press enquiries: quanho@gmail.com
We reply to every serious approach, including the ones we turn down.